Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• An in vitro osimertinib resistance evolution model using continuous high-dose drug induction recapitulates clinical resistance and identifies HDAC6 as a key resistance factor. • HDAC6 is significantly upregulated in osimertinib-resistant NSCLC cells, and its knockdown or pharmacological inhibition restores drug sensitivity. • HDAC6 overexpression in sensitive cells reduces osimertinib efficacy and accelerates resistance onset, confirming its causal role. • Mechanistically, HDAC6 promotes EGFR degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, suggesting HDAC6 as a novel therapeutic target to overcome osimertinib resistance.
Abstract
Osimertinib is the standard first-line treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR-sensitive mutations. However, drug resistance inevitably develops, highlighting the critical need for strategies to overcome this resistance and prolong therapeutic efficacy. Understanding the mechanisms underlying drug resistance is essential, and drug-resistant cell models serve as valuable tools for investigating acquired resistance. In this study, we establish an osimertinib resistance evolution model in vitro by continuous high-dose drug induction and identify cell lines exhibiting “permanent” resistance to osimertinib (osimertinib resistant, OR). Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq), gain- and loss-of-function assay, including lentiviral-mediated overexpression and RNAi knockdown, pharmacological inhibition, and protein degradation analysis reveal significant alterations in genes associated with epigenetic regulation, notably a marked upregulation of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) in OR cells. Knockdown of HDAC6 or pharmacological inhibition of HDAC6 restores the sensitivity of OR cells to osimertinib, whereas overexpression of HDAC6 in sensitive cells reduces drug efficacy and accelerates the onset of resistance. Furthermore, we find that HDAC6 upregulation promotes EGFR degradation, thereby contributing to resistance. Collectively, our findings demonstrate the utility of drug resistance evolution models in identifying key resistance factors. HDAC6 plays a pivotal role in osimertinib resistance, and targeting HDAC6 may represent a novel therapeutic strategy to overcome resistance and enhance treatment efficacy.
1. Introduction
In 2022, lung cancer accounted for approximately 2.5 million new cases and 1.8 million deaths worldwide [1], underscoring its persistent global health burden [2]. The identification of driver genes and the development of targeted therapies have substantially improved treatment outcomes for lung cancer patients with specific genetic mutations [3]. However, the inevitable emergence of drug resistance remains a major clinical challenge, adversely affecting patient survival and limiting the durability of treatment response. Therefore, extending the effective use of targeted therapies and delaying or overcoming resistance represent urgent and unresolved priorities in clinical oncology.
EGFR was the first driver gene identified in lung cancer [4]. Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is now used as a first-line treatment in clinical practice [5]. It extends progression-free survival (PFS) in lung cancer patients to 10–18.9 months [6,7], with a median overall survival (OS) of 26.8–38.6 months [7]. Several studies have characterized key mechanisms of osimertinib resistance, including target mutations, bypass signaling activation and histological transformation [8,9]. However, these studies have largely focused on patients after resistance has already developed. Drug resistance is a dynamic process, and understanding its evolution along with developing effective interventions is critical to overcoming clinical resistance.
Traditional resistance models typically involve gradually increasing drug concentrations to induce resistance, yielding a homogeneous population of resistant cells [10]. In contrast, high-dose “hard-hit” approaches more closely recapitulate the clinical onset of resistance and provide a superior platform for mechanistic investigation [11,12]. In this approach, a high concentration of osimertinib eliminate most sensitive cells, while the surviving cells gradually evolve drug-resistant traits under continuous drug pressure and ultimately establish stable drug resistance through adaptive mutagenesis [13].
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Cheng Yang, Danlei Xu, Zifang Zhu, Zhen Kang, Kangkang Ren, Yihan Yang, Ye Huang, Wei Zhang, Jun Che, Xinping Xu, Xiaolei Li (2026). HDAC6 promotes osimertinib resistance evolution in non-small cell lung cancer by activating EGFR degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2026084
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main finding of this study?
The study identifies HDAC6 as a key driver of osimertinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). HDAC6 is upregulated in resistant cells and promotes EGFR degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, leading to reduced drug efficacy. Targeting HDAC6 restores sensitivity to osimertinib.
How was the osimertinib resistance model established?
The researchers established an in vitro resistance evolution model by continuously exposing NSCLC cells to high-dose osimertinib, which eliminated most sensitive cells while allowing surviving cells to gradually develop stable resistance, mimicking clinical resistance onset.
What is the clinical significance of targeting HDAC6?
Targeting HDAC6 with pharmacological inhibitors or knockdown strategies could restore osimertinib sensitivity in resistant tumors, offering a novel therapeutic approach to overcome acquired resistance and improve treatment outcomes in NSCLC patients.
What is the mechanism by which HDAC6 contributes to resistance?
HDAC6 upregulation promotes the degradation of EGFR through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, reducing EGFR levels and thereby diminishing the efficacy of EGFR-targeted therapy like osimertinib.
What methods were used in this study?
The study employed transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq), gain- and loss-of-function assays (lentiviral overexpression and RNAi knockdown), pharmacological inhibition, and protein degradation analysis to investigate the role of HDAC6 in osimertinib resistance.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.