🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.3724/abbs.2024107Original Research

Glycosylation in the tumor immune response: the bitter side of sweetness

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: Glycosylation in the tumor immune response: the bitter side of sweetness

Yuting Cao¹,Wen Yi¹,Qiang Zhu¹

Department of Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Glycosylation in the tumor immune response: the bitter side of sweetness
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Published:2024Edition:Vol. 56, Issue 8 • pp. 1184-1198Citation:Yuting Cao et al. (2024), Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica (生物化学与生物物理学报).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Aberrant glycosylation in tumors modulates immune evasion by altering interactions with endogenous lectins, immune checkpoints, and the extracellular matrix. • Sialic acid-siglec interactions and galectin signaling are key mechanisms that suppress antitumor immunity, promoting Tregs and T-cell exhaustion. • Glycosylation affects immune checkpoint stability and binding affinity, influencing the efficacy of checkpoint blockade therapies. • Glycan-based cancer immunotherapies, including targeting glycosylation pathways, represent promising strategies to enhance current immunotherapies.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Glycosylation is the most structurally diverse form of post-translational modification (PTM) of proteins that affects a myriad of cellular processes. As a pivotal regulator of protein homeostasis, glycosylation notably impacts the function of proteins, spanning from protein localization and stability to protein-protein interactions. Aberrant glycosylation is a hallmark of cancer, and extensive studies have revealed the multifaceted roles of glycosylation in tumor growth, migration, invasion and immune escape. Over the past decade, glycosylation has emerged as an immune regulator in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we summarize the intricate interplay between glycosylation and the immune system documented in recent literature, which orchestrates the regulation of the tumor immune response through endogenous lectins, immune checkpoints and the extracellular matrix (ECM) in the TME. In addition, we discuss the latest progress in glycan-based cancer immunotherapy. This review provides a basic understanding of glycosylation in the tumor immune response and a theoretical framework for tumor immunotherapy.

1. Introduction

Glycosylation is a common form of protein and lipid modification by the covalent attachment of saccharides to proteins and lipids. The major types of glycosylation in mammals include N-glycosylation, O-glycosylation, O-GlcNAcylation, GPI-anchored glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans [1]. N-glycosylation, in which N-glycans are attached to asparagine within the conserved N-X-S/T sequon (where X represents any amino acid excluding proline) in peptides, frequently occurs in membrane proteins [1]. All N-glycans possess a core pentasaccharide; however, the diversity of monosaccharides and the complexity of linking patterns result in different types of N-glycans, which are divided into high-mannose, hybrid, and complex types [2]. In addition to N-glycosylation, O-glycosylation and O-GlcNAcylation occur at serine/threonine (S/T) residues [1]. O-glycosylation often refers to the glycosylation of glycans initiated by N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc). Biosynthesis of N-glycans is initiated in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and further elongated in the Golgi apparatus, while the entire synthesis of O-glycans occurs in the Golgi apparatus [3]. In contrast to N-glycans and O-glycans, O-GlcNAcylation is a unique monosaccharide β-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) modification that predominantly occurs in intracellular proteins and is mediated solely by O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) and the O-GlcNAcase (OGA) [4].

Glycosylation functions as a critical regulator of multiple physiopathological processes, including signal transduction and communication, invasion, cell–matrix interactions and immune modulation [5]. Therefore, deregulation of glycosylation is closely associated with tumor development and progression. Accumulating evidence highlights that aberrant glycosylation plays a pivotal role in tumor immunity through influencing the interaction of glycosylation receptors, lectins and ligands on the cell surfaces of tumor cells and immune cells. For example, tumor cells secrete galectins to promote regulatory T cells (Tregs) and T-cell exhaustion by impairing TME homeostasis [6–9]. The binding of sialylated glycans and sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin (siglec) receptors remodeled the immunosuppressive TME through activating the tumor-promoting phenotype of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), repressing the activation of natural killer (NK) cells and dendritic cell-mediated antigen presentation and subsequent T-cell responses [10–14]. Aberrant glycosylation also regulates the interaction between immune checkpoint molecules and their corresponding ligands by affecting their stability and/or binding affinity [15]. Thus, in-depth analysis of the role of glycosylation in the tumor immune response and how aberrant glycan structures modulate tumor-mediated immune evasion may provide new and viable strategies for potential immunotherapy.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Yuting Cao, Wen Yi, Qiang Zhu (2026). Glycosylation in the tumor immune response: the bitter side of sweetness. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2024107
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of glycosylation in tumor immune evasion?

Aberrant glycosylation on tumor cells alters interactions with lectins, immune checkpoints, and the extracellular matrix, promoting an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and enabling immune evasion.

How do sialic acid-siglec interactions affect antitumor immunity?

Sialic acid-siglec interactions on immune cells suppress NK cell activation, dendritic cell antigen presentation, and promote tumor-associated macrophage phenotypes, thereby dampening antitumor immune responses.

What are the main types of glycosylation discussed in the review?

The review covers N-glycosylation, O-glycosylation, O-GlcNAcylation, GPI-anchored glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans, with emphasis on N- and O-glycans in the tumor immune response.

How does glycosylation influence immune checkpoint therapy?

Glycosylation affects the stability and binding affinity of immune checkpoint molecules and their ligands, which can modulate the efficacy of checkpoint blockade immunotherapies.

What are the potential glycan-based cancer immunotherapies?

Potential strategies include targeting glycosylation enzymes, using glycan-based vaccines, and engineering antibodies to recognize specific glycan structures on tumor cells to enhance immune responses.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF