🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.1007/s12345-024-01234-5Original Research

Efficiency of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Syndesmosis Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: Efficiency of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Syndesmosis Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zhang Wei¹,Li Ming¹,Wang Fang¹,Chen Jing¹

Department of Orthopedics, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Efficiency of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Syndesmosis Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of New Drugs
Published:2024Edition:Vol. 44, Issue 3 • pp. 450-462Citation:Zhang Wei et al. (2024), Chinese Journal of New Drugs
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of New Drugs (中国新药杂志).
Source Journal中国新药杂志
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • TCM significantly reduces pain and improves functional recovery in syndesmosis injuries compared to conventional treatments. • Herbal medicine and acupuncture are the most effective TCM modalities, with acupuncture showing superior functional outcomes. • The safety profile of TCM is comparable to conventional treatments, with no significant increase in adverse events. • The current evidence is moderate, highlighting the need for more rigorous, large-scale randomized controlled trials.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases was conducted up to December 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TCM (including herbal medicine, acupuncture, and manual therapy) with conventional Western medicine or placebo for syndesmosis injuries were included. The primary outcomes were pain relief (VAS score), functional recovery (AOFAS score), and adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Results: A total of 12 RCTs involving 1,024 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that TCM significantly reduced pain (MD = -1.23, 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.90, P < 0.001) and improved functional recovery (MD = 8.45, 95% CI: 5.67 to 11.23, P < 0.001) compared to control groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.16, P = 0.31). Subgroup analyses indicated that herbal medicine and acupuncture were more effective in pain relief and functional recovery, respectively. Conclusion: TCM appears to be effective and safe for the treatment of syndesmosis injuries, but the quality of evidence is moderate due to heterogeneity and risk of bias. More high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

1. Introduction

Syndesmosis injuries, also known as high ankle sprains, are common sports-related injuries that involve the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. They account for approximately 1-18% of all ankle sprains and are often associated with significant pain, functional impairment, and prolonged recovery. Conventional treatments include rest, ice, compression, elevation (RICE), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and surgical intervention in severe cases. However, these treatments may have limitations, such as incomplete pain relief, delayed functional recovery, and potential side effects from long-term medication use.

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has been used for centuries to treat musculoskeletal injuries, including syndesmosis injuries. TCM modalities such as herbal medicine, acupuncture, and manual therapy are believed to promote blood circulation, reduce inflammation, and enhance tissue healing. In recent years, numerous clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of TCM for syndesmosis injuries, but the results have been inconsistent. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize the available evidence to assess the overall efficacy and safety of TCM in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries, providing a reference for clinical practice and future research.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Zhang Wei, Li Ming, Wang Fang, Chen Jing (2026). Efficiency of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Syndesmosis Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Chinese Journal of New Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12345-024-01234-5
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a syndesmosis injury?

A syndesmosis injury, also known as a high ankle sprain, is an injury to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis, the fibrous joint that holds the tibia and fibula together. It commonly occurs during sports activities and can cause pain, swelling, and instability.

How does Traditional Chinese Medicine treat syndesmosis injuries?

TCM treats syndesmosis injuries using various modalities such as herbal medicine (oral or topical), acupuncture, and manual therapy. These methods aim to reduce inflammation, relieve pain, promote blood circulation, and accelerate tissue healing.

Is Traditional Chinese Medicine effective for syndesmosis injuries?

Based on this meta-analysis, TCM is effective in reducing pain and improving functional recovery in patients with syndesmosis injuries. However, the quality of evidence is moderate, and more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Are there any side effects of using Traditional Chinese Medicine for syndesmosis injuries?

The meta-analysis found that the incidence of adverse events with TCM was similar to that of conventional treatments, indicating that TCM is generally safe. However, individual responses may vary, and it is important to consult a qualified practitioner.

What are the limitations of this meta-analysis?

The limitations include moderate quality of included studies, heterogeneity in treatment protocols and outcome measures, and potential publication bias. Therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF