Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• PKM2 exerts divergent regulation on immune checkpoints: it enhances PD-L1 expression while inhibiting PD-L2, promoting immune evasion. • GATA3 is identified as a key transcription factor mediating PKM2's effects, directly binding to PD-L1 and PD-L2 promoters. • In ESCC, PKM2 mRNA negatively correlates with CD8+ T-cell infiltration, suggesting a role in modulating the tumor immune microenvironment. • Targeting the PKM2-GATA3 axis may provide a novel strategy to fine-tune PD-L1 and PD-L2 levels and enhance cancer immunotherapy.
Abstract
Cancer cells evade immune detection through checkpoint molecules like PD-L1 and PD-L2 which suppress T-cell activation. While PD-L1 is well-studied, the role of PD-L2 remains unclear. Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), a metabolic enzyme, influences immune checkpoint regulation, but its role in PD-L1 and PD-L2 modulation is not well defined. Here, we investigate the role of pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) in modulating the immune checkpoint molecules PD-L1 and PD-L2 via GATA3 in cancer cells, with insights from both human and mouse models. We find that PKM2 enhances PD-L1 expression while inhibiting PD-L2, a dual regulatory mechanism that facilitates immune evasion. Knockdown and overexpression experiments revealed GATA3 as a key mediator. PKM2 knockout reduced GATA3 level, leading to decreased PD-L1 and increased PD-L2 expression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR demonstrates that GATA3 functions as a direct transcription factor capable of binding to the promoters of PD-L1 and PD-L2. In silico analyses of 81 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cases from the TCGA database demonstrate that PKM2 mRNA is unrelated to PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression but is negatively correlated with CD8+ T-cell infiltration in ESCC. To further validate these findings, we establish a xenograft model using immune-competent C57/BL6N mice, where knockdown of PKM2 results in significant downregulation of both PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression. Collectively, these findings underscore the divergent roles of PKM2 in regulating immune checkpoint expression in human and mouse cancer models and suggest that targeting the PKM2-GATA3 axis could enhance cancer immunotherapy by fine-tuning PD-L1 and PD-L2 levels.
1. Introduction
Cancer cells have developed sophisticated mechanisms to evade immune detection, enabling them to thrive and metastasize despite host immune system surveillance [1]. One of the most critical pathways involved in immune evasion is the regulation of immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) [2,3] and programmed death-ligand 2 (PD-L2) [4,5]. PD-L1, which binds to the PD-1 receptor on T cells, effectively disables the immune response against tumors, making it a prime target for cancer immunotherapies [6]. PD-L2, while less studied than PD-L1, has emerged as an important immune checkpoint molecule with unique roles in modulating the immune response in cancer. Unlike PD-L1, which is ubiquitously expressed on both tumor and immune cells, PD-L2 expression is more restricted and is predominantly found on antigen-presenting cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells. This selective expression pattern suggests that PD-L2 may play a distinct role in shaping the tumor microenvironment by influencing T-cell priming and activation. Recent studies have demonstrated that PD-L2 contributes to immune evasion by binding to the PD-1 receptor on T cells, thereby suppressing their activity. Moreover, PD-L2 has been implicated in the resistance to anti-PD-1 therapies, highlighting its potential as both a biomarker and a therapeutic target. For example, PD-L2 overexpression has been linked to poor prognosis in several cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer and gastric cancer, where its presence may indicate an alternative immune suppression pathway that is independent of PD-L1. These findings underscore the need for a deeper understanding of the functional role of PD-L2 in cancer and its implications for the development of more comprehensive immunotherapy strategies.
In addition to immune checkpoint regulation, cancer cells rely heavily on metabolic enzymes to support their rapid growth and immune evasion strategies. Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), a key enzyme in glycolysis, has garnered attention not only for its metabolic role but also for its influence on various nonmetabolic functions [8,9], including gene expression and immune modulation [10]. PKM2 is known to interact with several transcription factors, including STAT3 [11] and HIF-1α [12], to regulate PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. However, the specific role of PKM2 in modulating PD-L2 and the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study aims to elucidate the divergent roles of PKM2 in regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression via GATA3, providing insights into potential therapeutic targets for cancer immunotherapy.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Shuo He, Shujuan Luo, Bangwu Cai, Jiao Chen, Yao Zhang, Feng Zhao, Qing Liu, Tao Liu, Wei Wang, Tianyuan Peng, Xiaomei Lu, Shutao Zheng (2026). Divergent roles of PKM2 in regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression and their implications in human and mouse cancer models. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2025019
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the role of PKM2 in regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression?
PKM2 enhances PD-L1 expression while inhibiting PD-L2 expression, a dual regulatory mechanism that facilitates immune evasion in cancer cells.
How does PKM2 regulate PD-L1 and PD-L2?
PKM2 regulates PD-L1 and PD-L2 through the transcription factor GATA3. PKM2 knockout reduces GATA3 levels, leading to decreased PD-L1 and increased PD-L2 expression.
What is the clinical significance of the PKM2-GATA3 axis?
Targeting the PKM2-GATA3 axis could enhance cancer immunotherapy by fine-tuning PD-L1 and PD-L2 levels, potentially improving treatment outcomes.
What evidence supports the role of GATA3 in this regulation?
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR demonstrates that GATA3 directly binds to the promoters of PD-L1 and PD-L2, confirming its role as a transcription factor.
What are the implications for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)?
In ESCC, PKM2 mRNA is negatively correlated with CD8+ T-cell infiltration, suggesting that PKM2 may modulate the tumor immune microenvironment and influence immunotherapy response.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.