🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.3724/abbs.2025155Original Research

DDX11 interacts with PARP1 to facilitate PARylation, thereby promoting gallbladder cancer progression and conferring gemcitabine resistance

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: DDX11 interacts with PARP1 to facilitate PARylation, thereby promoting gallbladder cancer progression and conferring gemcitabine resistance

Yuan Gao¹,Junchi Liu¹,Xiang Yao¹,Letian Gong¹,Shubin Luo¹,Chaoxian Zhao¹,Shaofeng Pu¹,Ganglong Gao¹

Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
DDX11 interacts with PARP1 to facilitate PARylation, thereby promoting gallbladder cancer progression and conferring gemcitabine resistance
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Published:2026Edition:Vol. 58, Issue 5 • pp. 1008-1022Citation:Yuan Gao et al. (2026), Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica (生物化学与生物物理学报).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • DDX11 is overexpressed in gemcitabine-resistant gallbladder cancer cells and tissues, correlating with poor prognosis. • DDX11 knockdown suppresses GBC proliferation and tumor growth while restoring gemcitabine sensitivity. • Mechanistically, DDX11 interacts with PARP1 to enhance PARylation, promoting DNA repair and chemoresistance. • Combining gemcitabine with the PARP inhibitor olaparib shows synergistic anti-tumor effects, suggesting a novel therapeutic strategy.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Gemcitabine resistance poses a significant challenge in gallbladder cancer (GBC) treatment, necessitating exploration of its molecular mechanisms. This study focuses on DDX11, which is highly expressed in gemcitabine-resistant GBC cells, suggesting a potential role in DNA damage repair. We establish gemcitabine-resistant GBC cell lines and observe significantly higher DDX11 expression in these cells than in parental cells. Clinical tissue analysis through qRT-PCR, western blot analysis, and immunohistochemistry confirms elevated DDX11 levels in tumors compared with adjacent normal tissues. Functional assays demonstrate that DDX11 knockdown inhibits cell proliferation, colony formation, and tumor growth, while restoring gemcitabine sensitivity. Mechanistically, proteomic analysis and co-immunoprecipitation reveal that the interaction of DDX11 with PARP1 leads to increased poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation), which promotes DNA repair and drug resistance. Notably, combining gemcitabine with the PARP inhibitor olaparib has synergistic anti-tumor effects on resistant cells. These findings indicate that DDX11 contributes to GBC progression and chemoresistance by regulating PARP1-mediated PARylation and that targeting this pathway with PARP inhibitors may overcome gemcitabine resistance. This study provides new insights into GBC drug resistance mechanisms and suggests that combining conventional chemotherapy with PARP inhibition is a potential therapeutic strategy for resistant patients. The DDX11-PARP1-PARylation axis represents a promising target for improving GBC treatment outcomes, particularly in gemcitabine-resistant patients.

1. Introduction

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is a highly malignant tumor of the biliary system with a poor prognosis [1,2]. Its incidence among gastrointestinal tumors is relatively low (< 2 per 100,000), with a higher prevalence in females than in males [3]. Globally, there are approximately 116,000 new cases and 85,000 deaths annually, predominantly in the Far East and South American regions [1]. Current gemcitabine-platinum combination chemotherapies have shown limited efficacy (< 30% response rate) [4,5], and the 5-year survival rate remains at approximately 18% [6], highlighting significant clinical challenges.

Moreover, chemoresistance represents a major therapeutic obstacle [7], classified as either acquired (recurrence after initial response) or intrinsic (primary nonresponse) [8]. Underlying mechanisms include drug efflux upregulation [9], metabolic reprogramming, target mutations, apoptosis evasion [10], epigenetic alterations [11], and microenvironment remodeling [12,13]. Biomarker-guided personalized therapies may improve outcomes [8,14].

While genomic studies have characterized GBC molecular features [15–18], resistance mechanisms remain understudied. Similarly, there is a lack of reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of this disease [19]. Our study established gemcitabine-resistant cell lines and identified the DNA helicase DDX11 as a potential resistance mediator through microarray analysis. As a genome stability regulator [20,21], DDX11 dysfunction may impair DNA repair, promoting chemoresistance, a novel finding that offers therapeutic insights.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Yuan Gao, Junchi Liu, Xiang Yao, Letian Gong, Shubin Luo, Chaoxian Zhao, Shaofeng Pu, Ganglong Gao (2026). DDX11 interacts with PARP1 to facilitate PARylation, thereby promoting gallbladder cancer progression and conferring gemcitabine resistance. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2025155
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of DDX11 in gallbladder cancer?

DDX11 is highly expressed in gemcitabine-resistant gallbladder cancer cells and tissues, and it promotes cancer progression and chemoresistance by interacting with PARP1 to enhance PARylation, which facilitates DNA repair.

How does DDX11 confer gemcitabine resistance?

DDX11 interacts with PARP1 to increase poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation), which enhances DNA repair mechanisms, allowing cancer cells to survive gemcitabine-induced DNA damage.

Can PARP inhibitors overcome gemcitabine resistance in gallbladder cancer?

Yes, combining gemcitabine with the PARP inhibitor olaparib shows synergistic anti-tumor effects on resistant cells, suggesting that targeting the DDX11-PARP1-PARylation axis may overcome gemcitabine resistance.

What is the clinical significance of this study?

This study provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms of gallbladder cancer drug resistance and suggests that combining conventional chemotherapy with PARP inhibition could be a promising therapeutic strategy for gemcitabine-resistant patients.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF