🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Official PDF TranslationChinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research

Comparison of biomechanical differences between cervical rotation and rotation-traction manipulations using finite element analysis

Authors: Weng Rui; Huang Xuecheng; Lin Dongxin; Xie Siyuan; Yu Yaoshuai; Chen Cairui; Tan Peng; Zhao Zilin; Xie Pusheng; Li Yikai

DOI: 10.12307/2026.21381Status: Verified Translated Edition
Sponsored AdvertisementAd Placement Area
reCAPTCHA Bot Shield Active

Preparing Secure Academic Download

Verifying human reader & generating high-resolution document...

Verifying Document Integrity15s remaining
← Back to Article
Protected by Google reCAPTCHA v3.PrivacyTerms
Sponsored ContentAdSense In-Feed Ad Slot

Key Findings in This Report

• Cervical rotation manipulation significantly increases stress on the intervertebral disc and facet joints compared to rotation-traction manipulation, potentially increasing the risk of disc injury. • Rotation-traction manipulation more effectively expands the intervertebral foramen volume (19.8% increase) than rotation manipulation (15.5%), which may be beneficial for nerve root decompression. • Cervical rotation manipulation promotes greater forward displacement of the herniated disc (1.067 mm vs. 0.960 mm), which may help in reducing nerve root compression. • Both manipulations are effective for cervical radiculopathy, but the choice should be individualized based on the patient's specific pathology and biomechanical considerations.