Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• Polyamine metabolism is dysregulated in tumors, offering novel targets for cancer therapy. • Inhibiting polyamine biosynthesis and transport systems are promising antitumor strategies. • Polyamines regulate cancer signaling pathways, supporting combination therapies. • Supplemental polyamines show antitumor activity, suggesting benefits when combined with immunotherapy.
Abstract
The dysregulation of polyamines in tumors has made polyamine metabolism an appealing target for cancer therapy. Gene mutations drive the reprogramming of polyamine metabolism in tumors, presenting promising opportunities for clinical treatment. The proposed strategies involve inhibiting polyamine biosynthesis while also targeting the polyamine transport system as antitumor approaches. A growing number of drugs aimed at polyamine biosynthesis and transport systems are undergoing clinical trials. Polyamine metabolism plays a role in regulating cancer signaling pathways, suggesting potential combination therapies for cancer treatment. Furthermore, supplemental polyamine substances have demonstrated antitumor activity, indicating that combining polyamines with downstream targets or immunotherapy could offer significant clinical benefits. These discoveries open new avenues for leveraging polyamine metabolism in anticancer therapy.
1. Introduction
Polyamines are natural components in cells and body fluids and belong to a class of long-chain aliphatic compounds containing two or more amino groups. Important polyamines in mammals, such as putrescine, spermidine, and spermine, play crucial physiological roles. With multiple positive charges, polyamines exhibit strong affinity for nucleic acids and play a significant role in regulating processes such as replication, transcription, and cell division [1]. Polyamines are widely distributed in various animals, plants, and bacteria and play crucial roles in regulating cellular physiological functions such as cell proliferation and differentiation [2]. Furthermore, polyamines are also implicated in immune cell differentiation and the modulation of inflammatory responses [3].
Over the years, researchers have reported that polyamines are able to modulate ion channels and participate in transcriptional, translational and post-translational activities [4,5]. Additionally, polyamines are involved in regulating chromatin remodeling, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF-5A) hypnosis and apoptosis [6]. Intracellular polyamines are strictly regulated at millimolar concentrations through the coordination of biosynthesis, degradation metabolism, and extracellular uptake transport in a dynamic equilibrium process [7,8]. Extracellular polyamines are derived mainly from the diet, microbiota, and shed or damaged cells, where they are absorbed into the circulation or enter the cells to exert their functions [8,9]. Intracellular polyamine biosynthesis decreases with age, and supplementation with spermine and spermidine has been shown to prolong lifespan by inhibiting inflammatory responses and promoting cellular autophagy [10].
Dysregulation of polyamine metabolism is commonly observed in various tumors and is directly associated with the initiation and progression of cancer [11]. Studies have demonstrated that compared with normal cells, tumor cells exhibit elevated levels of polyamines [12,13]. Tumor cell proliferation requires an intracellular pool of polyamines for maintenance. Reducing intracellular polyamine levels in the body to enhance antitumor immune response is considered an effective antitumor strategy [14]. In addition, polyamine metabolism is interconnected with the microbiota and diet, contributing to the establishment of a tumor microenvironment that promotes cancer initiation and progression [8]. Some gene mutations and signaling pathways are involved in the regulation of polyamine metabolism disorders in tumor cells, providing rational targets for intervention in cancer therapy. In addition, recent evidence has shown that polyamines can enhance the body’s antitumor immune response, providing new evidence for the use of polyamines in cancer therapy. Therefore, new strategies for combination therapy utilizing polyamines should be explored for the treatment and prevention of multiple types of cancers.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
He Liu, Yi Liu, Xinyue Wang, Zhiwen Xiao, Quanxing Ni, Xianjun Yu, Guopei Luo (2026). Antitumor potential of polyamines in cancer. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2025030
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are polyamines and why are they important in cancer?
Polyamines are natural compounds with multiple amino groups that regulate cell growth and proliferation. In cancer, their metabolism is often dysregulated, leading to elevated levels that support tumor progression, making them a target for therapy.
How can polyamine metabolism be targeted for cancer treatment?
Strategies include inhibiting polyamine biosynthesis and blocking the polyamine transport system. Several drugs targeting these pathways are in clinical trials, and combining them with other therapies may enhance efficacy.
What is the role of polyamines in the tumor microenvironment?
Polyamines interact with the microbiota and diet, contributing to a tumor-promoting microenvironment. They also modulate immune responses, which can be harnessed for immunotherapy combinations.
Can polyamine supplementation be beneficial in cancer therapy?
Yes, supplemental polyamines have shown antitumor activity in some contexts, and combining them with downstream targets or immunotherapy may offer clinical benefits, though more research is needed.
What are the future directions for polyamine-based cancer therapy?
Future directions include developing combination therapies that target polyamine metabolism alongside other pathways, and exploring the use of polyamines to enhance antitumor immune responses.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.